🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.