🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to reinitiate atomic talks with the United States provided that it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has stated.

The Iranian diplomat said exclusively dialogue was effective, and shared recent overtures had come from go-betweens to restart discussions with the US government. He said Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran was not yet able to authorize the global atomic watchdog to visit bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Walking a Complex Path

The foreign minister is navigating a complex path since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be acting from a stance of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged more resilient defensively and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to process nuclear material within its borders that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Earlier Talks Unexpectedly Terminated

The prior phases of talks between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that culminated with the US president claiming the locations had been eliminated. Subsequently, European countries employed their privilege to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.

Magic Solution Offered

Iranian officials said they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. The two nations would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the discussions that American atomic experts could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Officials stated on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the deal to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Current Position

Tehran representatives said the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the offer could be resurrected in certain ways if negotiations reopen.

The US president recently stated he had been getting signals that Iran desired to reopen negotiations, but in private Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from Washington either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been accused of inactivity in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran asserts negotiations is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Position

In his remarks to the forum, intended to depict the US as a controlling nation that misuses the notion of global regulations, Araghchi stated the fortnight-long engagement showed the clash could not be ended by armed force. He stated the strikes commenced with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with total Washington understanding and cooperation, making trust hard to rebuild.

Dialogue Remains the Final Resolution

The foreign minister said: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned dialogue; it was the United States and the Western nations that had repeatedly tried to enforce their desires during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be viable and remains the primary solution to settle disputes, but its criteria, rules and tenets must be adhered to."

"Provided that they talk to the Iranian people with the approach of dignity and respect, they will receive a reply in the equivalent tone."

Repair and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of restoration and reconstruction, the foreign minister stated he was confident Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We gained many lessons from this engagement; we have discovered our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He added: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to obliterate, continues to exist. The sites and equipment, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but did not succeed to break. The Iranian people have become stronger, more cohesive, and more backing of the leadership and the nation in the face of this invasion."